How a Couple Used AI to File the First $665M Federal Lawsuit Over California Eco-Fraud

‎On April 8, 2025, John Donnelly Sweeney and Jennifer Frost filed a 34-page federal lawsuit that could mark a milestone in U.S. legal history. Using xAI’s Grok and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, the couple produced what may be the first civil rights and RICO complaint drafted primarily by artificial intelligence. The case seeks $665 million in damages and accuses California officials and agencies of orchestrating a 25-year environmental fraud scheme.

‎

‎John Sweeney files $665M RICO lawsuit, drafted with xAI’s Grok and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, accusing California of a 25-year eco-fraud that looted wetlands and seized $152M in land.

‎Beata Zawrzel—NurPhoto/Getty Images

‎

‎The filing outlines allegations of racketeering, property theft, and civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It claims California’s wetland restoration efforts were manipulated to inflate project results, divert public funds, and conceal the near extinction of the Delta Smelt. Sweeney and Frost argue that state and federal agencies used falsified data to enrich organizations while stripping them of property worth over $150 million.

‎

‎Sweeney says the lawsuit was born out of necessity after being denied legal counsel for years. In 2023, his bankruptcy case left him without representation, leading him and Frost to turn to AI. Over four months, they trained Grok and ChatGPT with 7,000 court records, federal manuals, and case law. According to Sweeney, Grok’s ability to recall thousands of documents made it the backbone of the filing, while ChatGPT helped refine the arguments.

‎

‎The lawsuit traces the alleged conspiracy back to 1999, naming the San Francisco Estuary Institute and affiliated conservation officials. It claims the EcoAtlas database—funded by the Environmental Protection Agency—was stocked with projects that never existed. These projects, allegedly listed as completed fish habitats, were used to secure millions in federal and state funding. The complaint cites cases of private islands being falsely logged as restored wetlands without permits or work ever taking place.

‎

‎Sweeney asserts that this alleged fraud accelerated the Delta Smelt’s collapse, leaving taxpayers and property owners to bear the cost. A 2015 records request revealed thousands of emails from state agencies, which he says showed officials justifying unpermitted work instead of correcting it. He claims that the response was not reform but retaliation—fines, lawsuits, and asset seizures designed to silence him.

‎

‎The complaint also details property losses tied to the alleged scheme. Point Buckler Island, valued at $40 million, was sold in January 2025 for $3.78 million. Chipps Island, worth $125 million, was sold in 2017 for $8.6 million. Combined, the couple claims $152 million in property value was wiped out. The lawsuit describes these sales as unlawful seizures carried out under expired writs and defective court orders.

‎

‎Court rulings are also central to the filing. It alleges that Solano County Judge Christine Carringer blocked Sweeney from hiring attorneys, froze his assets, and allowed the disputed sale of his property. Other rulings by state and federal judges are described as complicit in upholding the alleged scheme. The complaint contends that judicial decisions not only denied due process but also enabled the continuation of fraudulent environmental projects.

‎

‎The damages sought include $165 million for property losses and $500 million for emotional and financial harm. The lawsuit also demands the return of Point Buckler and Chipps Islands and a federal investigation into what it describes as fabricated fish habitats. If upheld, it could be the first AI-driven RICO case to proceed in U.S. federal court.

‎

‎Sweeney argues that the lawsuit demonstrates how artificial intelligence can level the field for citizens without access to legal counsel. By combining AI tools with personal records and public documents, he believes individuals can challenge systemic abuses that were once insulated by legal barriers. The case is currently pending assignment in the Northern District of California.